Are 40% Staff Cuts the New AI Normal?

Are 40% Staff Cuts the New AI Normal?

More

Descriptions:

Jack Dorsey made headlines in late February 2026 by announcing that Block — formerly Square — would cut more than 4,000 employees, reducing its headcount from over 10,000 to just under 6,000, a 40% reduction carried out in a single announcement. In his memo to staff, Dorsey explicitly cited AI-driven efficiency gains and Block’s internally developed AI agent Goose as enabling a “fundamentally new way of working,” setting a new benchmark of $2 million gross profit per employee — four times Block’s pre-COVID efficiency of $500K. Block’s stock surged more than 25% in overnight trading.

The announcement immediately sparked fierce debate about whether AI was the genuine driver or a convenient cover story for unwinding COVID-era overhiring. Critics including bond investor Will Slaughter and Alliant Capital pointed out that Block had tripled its headcount between 2019 and 2022, drawing comparisons to Jack Dorsey’s management of Twitter before Elon Musk’s acquisition. Economist Alex Emas introduced the term “AI laundering” — attributing layoffs to AI transformation when operational mismanagement may be the actual cause.

Dorsey responded publicly, acknowledging the overhiring while defending the AI rationale, and on the subsequent earnings call stated that most companies will face similar AI-related restructuring in due course. The episode provides the most direct real-world test case yet of whether corporate AI efficiency claims hold up to scrutiny, with multiple named analysts, investors, and executives offering competing interpretations of the same data.


📺 Source: The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News · Published February 28, 2026
🏷️ Format: News Analysis

1 Item

Companies