Descriptions:
Fahd Mirza puts three flagship reasoning models head-to-head in a live comparison: Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Qwen 3.6 Max preview. All three run simultaneously at maximum reasoning effort on the same prompt — no cherry-picking, no retries — with the task being a full working application build, not a toy script.
The video provides context on each model’s positioning: Claude Opus 4.7 is Anthropic’s strongest release targeting real-world professional and software engineering tasks; DeepSeek V4 Pro is a 1.6 trillion parameter open-source mixture-of-experts model with a Codeforces benchmark rating of 3206, placing it ahead of the vast majority of competitive human programmers; and Qwen 3.6 Max preview is Alibaba’s upcoming flagship leading on agentic coding across six major benchmarks. For DeepSeek, Deep Think and Expert Mode are enabled; Qwen runs in thinking mode; Opus 4.7 uses adaptive mode.
After code generation, all three apps are copied to Ubuntu, installed using each model’s own instructions, and tested end-to-end — covering account registration, login, transaction CRUD operations, dashboard graphs, and delete confirmation flows. Mirza notes observable differences in UI polish and UX decisions, with Claude’s version edging out the others on graph presentation, while all three demonstrate solid instruction-following. The result is a practical, deployability-focused lens on model performance that published benchmarks alone don’t capture.
📺 Source: Fahd Mirza · Published April 25, 2026
🏷️ Format: Comparison
