Summary
Which AI video generator makes the best product ads? Youri van Hofwegen tests four popular models, Seedance 2.5, Kling 4.0, Wan 3.0 Prime, and MiniMax H3, on identical prompts, all run through the Higgsfield platform. The video is sponsored by Higgsfield.
Each model gets the same product reference sheet, generated with GPT Image 2.5, for three fictional products: a yogurt called Happy Spoon, an energy drink called Loud Monday, and a running shoe called Moth. The tests escalate from a motion-graphics ad with no people, to a full commercial with actors, to a 12-shot ad that runs up to 30 seconds. Each ad is scored on product realism, fidelity to the reference, motion, text and logo accuracy, how ready it is to post, and how many shots it followed, with a separate score for cost.
Seedance 2.5 comes out ahead, winning the second test with 28 points and producing the most natural-looking actors, while Kling 4.0 drops from a tie for second to last once people appear and even changes the can’s label from 355 ml to 395 ml. Viewers get a practical look at where each model succeeds or fails, including label consistency, glitchy animation, and credit costs, plus the prompts and workflow used.
📺 Source: Youri van Hofwegen · Published November 08, 2026
🏷️ Format: Comparison
